the Aged Care Today magazine featured articles

New South Wales aged care sector: reform must be matched by capacity

In New South Wales, the aged care story in 2026 is all about reform. A lot of conversations swirl around whether there is practical capacity to deliver on reform in a way that improves life for older people.

Reform is raising expectations

The introduction of the new rights-based Aged Care Act and the transition to Support at Home are reshaping expectations across the sector. Providers are being asked to adapt to new funding, compliance and service delivery settings while continuing to support older people with increasingly complex needs. Reform is welcome, but reform alone will not resolve the pressures already facing the system.

Capacity gaps are being felt across the system

For New South Wales, the clearest challenge remains capacity. Demand for both home care and residential aged care continues to outpace supply, and that shortfall is being felt not only by providers and families, but across the broader health system. In parts of the state, particularly regional areas and growth corridors, the lack of available aged care places and timely support at home is contributing to delayed hospital discharge and avoidable pressure on acute care.

That is why the NSW budget response matters. State investment aimed at easing hospital pressure acknowledges an important truth: aged care is not a separate policy issue sitting beside health care. It is deeply connected to hospital flow, recovery, independence and quality of life for older people. When aged care capacity falls behind, pressure simply shifts elsewhere.

Workforce will determine whether change succeeds

Workforce remains another defining issue. Providers are navigating higher expectations under reform while continuing to face recruitment and retention pressures, especially in regional and rural communities. Without a stronger workforce pipeline and settings that support service delivery on the ground, reform risks asking more of a sector that is already stretched.

For New South Wales, then, the key task is to turn reform into practical improvement. That means faster expansion of home and residential care, stronger workforce support and investment settings that reflect the scale of demand. Providers are not resisting change – they are calling for the conditions that make change work. If those conditions are in place, reform can support a more sustainable, people-centred aged care system. If they are not, older people will continue to feel the gap between policy ambition and lived reality.

Victoria aged care sector: investment must connect with ageing well

In Victoria, the aged sector is focusing heavily on the investment and how it can reach the areas that matter most to older people and the providers who support them.

A stronger connection between aged care and health care

The Victorian State Budget has included targeted support for aged care and related health services, particularly through public sector aged care, hospital-connected care and measures designed to ease pressure on the wider health system. These commitments recognise an important reality: when aged care works well, it improves outcomes for older people and reduces pressure elsewhere in the system.

That health-system connection is especially significant in Victoria. Investment in initiatives linked to care closer to home, residential aged care quality and hospital flow shows a growing recognition that aged care cannot be treated as separate from health care. Older people do not experience these systems as separate, and neither do providers working across them.

Older people need more than service funding alone

At the same time, the Victorian picture is broader than service delivery alone. Alongside aged care investment, there is a continuing question about whether the needs of an ageing population are being addressed in a sufficiently targeted way. Older Victorians are not only affected by access to care, but by housing security, cost-of-living pressure, accessibility, transport, social connection and the availability of tailored supports that help people age well in their communities.

Workforce will shape the impact of investment

Workforce also remains a live issue. Providers continue to operate in an environment where expectations are rising, care needs are becoming more complex and regional service delivery remains challenging. Investment in services is important, but without the workforce to sustain those services, the benefits will be harder to realise in practice.

For Victoria, then, the challenge is to ensure that aged care investment forms part of a broader ageing strategy. The state has made meaningful commitments that recognise the importance of aged care to both individuals and the health system. The next step is to ensure those commitments are connected, targeted and shaped around the lived experience of older people. That is how investment becomes not just a short-term response, but part of a more people-centred and sustainable future for ageing in Victoria.

For Victoria, the next step is to ensure aged care investment sits within a broader, people-centred strategy for ageing well across the state.

Australian Capital Territory aged care sector: access, continuity and reform in a smaller market 

In the ACT, the aged care story in 2026 is not defined by scale so much as by access. In a smaller market, where service options are fewer and the margin for disruption is narrower, the key question is whether older people and carers can rely on continuity of care as national reform rolls forward.

Respite has exposed the pressure points

That challenge has become especially visible through respite. The recent focus on Burrangiri and local respite access has underlined how quickly pressure can build when policy settings change in a market with limited alternatives. In a larger jurisdiction, service disruption may be absorbed across multiple providers. In the ACT, it is felt more immediately by older people, families and carers.

Reform is testing provider readiness

This is why the ACT should be understood not just as a smaller jurisdiction, but as a place where the practical test of reform is highly visible. The transition to Support at Home and the broader move under the new Aged Care Act place significant demands on providers, systems and workforce readiness. Ageing Australia’s member communications to ACT providers have already reflected that focus on transition, provider readiness and practical support.

Continuity of care matters most in a smaller market

Respite is one part of a broader issue. In the ACT, continuity of local services matters because it supports carers, helps older people remain at home longer and reduces unnecessary pressure on hospitals. When access becomes uncertain, the effects extend beyond individual providers and into the wider care system.

The ACT is also a reminder that reform cannot be measured only by new policy architecture. It must be measured by whether local communities can still access care that is timely, practical and close to home. In smaller markets, reliability matters as much as scale.

For the ACT, then, the central issue is resilience. Older people, carers and providers need a care system that can absorb reform, preserve access and maintain confidence during change. If that happens, the ACT can show how a smaller jurisdiction responds well to reform. If it does not, even small service gaps will continue to have outsized consequences.

For the ACT, the next step is to ensure reform strengthens – rather than disrupts – the local care continuity that older people and carers rely on.

Western Australia aged care sector: investment must match the scale of need

In Western Australia, the aged care story in 2026 is not only about rising demand. It is about whether investment and policy settings can match the scale, geography and cost pressures shaping care across the state.

Western Australia faces a distinctive challenge. Its population is spread across metropolitan, regional and remote communities, while providers are working in one of the country’s most geographically complex operating environments. For older people, that means access to aged care is shaped not just by demand, but by where they live, how far services must stretch and whether the system has the capacity to respond in time.

Capacity pressures are being felt across the system

The clearest pressure point remains residential aged care capacity. Existing services are under strain, and the need for more places has become increasingly urgent. That matters not only for older people seeking care, but for the broader health system. When aged care capacity falls short, hospitals carry the pressure, discharge slows and people remain in settings that are no longer right for their needs.

Aged care investment supports more than aged care alone

This is why the state budget response is important. Investment and policy measures designed to support additional beds and improve system flow recognise a practical truth: aged care capacity is not a side issue to health system performance. It is central to it. Supporting older people to access the right care, in the right place, at the right time improves both individual outcomes and system sustainability.

Regional and remote delivery remains the real test

At the same time, Western Australia’s challenge goes beyond bed numbers alone. Providers continue to navigate higher costs, workforce shortages and the difficulty of sustaining services across large distances. Regional and remote communities feel this most sharply, where thin markets and workforce constraints can make access more fragile and choices more limited.

For Western Australia, then, the task is to ensure investment keeps pace with reality. The state has recognised the importance of aged care to both older people and the wider health system. The next step is to make sure those settings are strong enough to support long-term growth, regional service viability and a workforce capable of delivering care across a vast and diverse state. That is how investment moves from short-term relief to a more sustainable, people-centred aged care future.

For Western Australia, the next step is to ensure that aged care investment is matched by the long-term capacity and workforce needed to deliver care wherever older people live.

Queensland aged care sector: stronger support must reach the whole state 

In Queensland, the aged care story in 2026 is not only about pressure. It is also about whether the system can respond at the scale required across a large, decentralised and fast-growing state.

Queensland’s population growth, ageing profile and regional spread mean aged care pressures are felt across multiple fronts at once. Providers are working in a system where access to home support, residential care, workforce supply and hospital flow are all deeply connected. When one part of that system is delayed or constrained, the consequences are felt quickly elsewhere.

Aged care pressure is being felt across the system

The clearest example is the link between aged care and hospitals. Delays in access to home care, residential care and other supports are adding to pressure on public hospitals, with older people remaining in settings that are no longer the right fit for their needs. That is why state budget measures and broader investment settings matter. Supporting aged care capacity is not only about care services alone; it is also about improving system flow and outcomes for older people.

Queensland’s challenge is also one of reach

Queensland’s challenge, however, is not simply one of volume. It is also one of reach. A state as large and decentralised as Queensland cannot rely on solutions concentrated in major metropolitan centres. Providers in regional, rural and remote communities continue to face workforce shortages, service gaps and the practical difficulty of delivering care close to where older people live.

Investment must support long-term delivery

This is where the broader policy task becomes clearer. Investment in aged care needs to support both immediate pressure relief and longer-term sustainability. That means a stronger workforce pipeline, more timely support at home, appropriate residential care capacity and settings that recognise the real operating conditions facing providers across the state.

For Queensland, then, the central issue is whether support can be delivered consistently and at scale. The state’s aged care future depends not only on more services, but on making sure those services are available in the places people need them and in a way that reduces pressure on families, providers and hospitals alike. If investment is matched by reach, workforce and practical delivery, Queensland can strengthen outcomes for older people across the whole state.

For Queensland, the next step is to ensure that stronger support reaches every part of the state and translates into timely, practical care for older people.

South Australia aged care sector: investment must improve care flow 

In South Australia, the aged care story in 2026 is not only about system pressure. The system focusses heavily on how care is delivered in a way that delivers better outcomes and eases strain across the broader health system.

Aged care pressure is being felt through care transitions

The clearest issue is transition. Delays in moving from hospital into aged care remain one of the strongest signs that capacity is under strain. When appropriate places are not available, older people remain in settings that are no longer the best fit for their needs, while pressure builds across acute care.

That makes investment in transition pathways and aged care capacity especially significant. It reflects an understanding that aged care is not just a downstream service. It is a core part of how the broader health and care system functions.

South Australia has recognised the need for capacity growth

The state’s response has shown a willingness to step in where more capacity is needed. New commitments around additional aged care beds and care precinct development signal recognition that population ageing requires more than short-term fixes.

These measures matter because they acknowledge the scale of demand and the importance of providing older people with more appropriate options beyond hospital.

At the same time, capacity growth is not simply about the number of beds. It is also about whether services are viable, staffed and equipped to meet increasingly complex needs. Without that, expansion on paper will not always translate into better access in practice.

The broader ageing agenda still matters

South Australia’s challenge also extends beyond service flow alone. Older people’s wellbeing is shaped by cost of living, dementia support, regional access, transport and whether systems are designed to support ageing in a way that is practical, inclusive and dignified. Investment in aged care is important, but it works best when it sits within a broader vision for ageing well.

For South Australia, then, the task is to ensure today’s responses become part of a stronger and more connected care continuum. The state has recognised that investing in aged care benefits both older people and the wider system. The next step is to make sure those commitments are translated into sustainable capacity, stronger workforce support and better care transitions for the future.

For South Australia, the next step is to turn today’s investment into a more sustainable and connected aged care pathway for the future.

Tasmania aged care sector: planning must keep pace with an ageing state 

In Tasmania, the aged care story in 2026 is not only about pressure in the system. It is about whether planning, investment and service delivery are keeping pace with a state where ageing is already reshaping demand.

Tasmania’s population profile gives the issue particular urgency. As one of Australia’s oldest states, Tasmania is experiencing aged care pressures that many other jurisdictions will increasingly face in the years ahead. That makes the state a clear test of whether aged care systems can respond early enough, locally enough and consistently enough to support older people well.

Longer waits are exposing the pressure

The clearest sign of strain is access. Older Tasmanians continue to experience long waits for residential aged care and ongoing delays in moving to the most appropriate care setting. When access is delayed, pressure is not contained within aged care alone. It is felt across hospitals, families and local communities.

That is why investment in aged care capacity matters so much in Tasmania. It is not only about adding places. It is also about improving flow through the broader health and care system and ensuring older people can remain connected to the places and communities that matter to them.

Geography shapes the Tasmanian challenge

Tasmania’s aged care pressures are also shaped by geography. Much of the state is regional, and outside Hobart and Launceston access to providers, health services and workforce can be more limited. In practice, this means older people can face fewer local options and greater barriers to ageing in place, even when that is their clear preference.

This is where Tasmania’s challenge becomes broader than residential care alone. Reliable home support, local health access and workforce availability all matter if older people are to stay connected to community and avoid unnecessary movement into crisis-driven care.

Investment is important, but preparedness matters most

Recent investment in additional beds and facility expansion is an encouraging sign, particularly for regional Tasmania.

It shows recognition that the state needs more aged care capacity and stronger local options. But capacity growth on its own will not be enough if it is not matched by workforce planning, home support and a clearer long-term strategy for responding to demographic change.

For Tasmania, then, the key issue is preparedness. The state has an opportunity to lead by showing what it takes to support an older and more regionally dispersed population well. The next step is to ensure that planning, workforce and service delivery keep pace with that reality so older Tasmanians can access timely, practical and people-centred care where they live.

For Tasmania, the next step is to turn demographic foresight into practical action so older people can access timely care, close to home, as demand continues to grow.

Northern Territory aged care sector:  care must reach where they live with cultural safety

In the Northern Territory, the aged care story in 2026 is not simply about expanding services. It is about whether care can be delivered in a way that matches the Territory’s geography, communities and cultural realities.

The Northern Territory remains a smaller aged care market than most other jurisdictions, but that does not make the challenge smaller. In many ways, it makes it sharper. Delivering timely and appropriate care across remote and regional communities requires service models that can work across vast distances, in thin markets and in places where workforce supply is limited.

Bed shortages are being felt across the system

The clearest pressure point remains access to residential care. When older people cannot move into the right setting at the right time, the consequences are felt not only by individuals and families, but across the health system. This is why additional investment in residential capacity matters. It is about more than beds alone; it is about giving older Territorian’s access to more appropriate care and reducing avoidable strain elsewhere.

That makes the commitment to new capacity especially significant. It reflects recognition that the Territory needs stronger infrastructure if it is to respond to rising demand and support older people in the right setting.

Thin markets shape access to care

The Northern Territory’s deeper challenge is the fragility of access in smaller and more remote service markets. In many communities, there are few providers, limited local options and a workforce that is stretched across large distances. In that context, even small service gaps can have major consequences.

This is where the Territory differs from larger states. The question is not only whether more services exist overall, but whether the right support is available in the right place, at the right time and close enough to community to remain practical and trusted.

Culturally safe care is essential, not optional

For many older Territorians, especially First Nations Elders, quality aged care must also be culturally safe care. Connection to Country, family, language and community is not separate from good care; it is part of it. That means service design in the Territory cannot simply replicate metropolitan models from elsewhere. It must reflect local realities and cultural expectations if it is to work well.

For the Northern Territory, then, the central issue is equity. Investment in aged care will matter most if it improves access across remote and regional communities, strengthens workforce capability and supports care models that are both practical and culturally safe. The challenge is not only to build more services, but to ensure they are the right services for the people and communities who rely on them.

For the Northern Territory, the next step is to ensure that aged care investment reaches the communities that need it most and supports care that is both locally practical and culturally safe.